The semiconductor industry is witnessing a significant wave of strategic partnerships and market expansions, particularly involving key players like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) and IntelRecent news suggests that TSMC is contemplating a joint venture with Intel that would allow it to make inroads into the American marketHowever, conflicting reports have also surfaced indicating that TSMC, along with Broadcom, may be exploring the possibility of splitting Intel into two distinct entitiesRegardless of which scenario unfolds, the implication remains that TSMC is poised for an expansion into the U.S. landscape, and this possibility has garnered the attention of financial powerhouses such as Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan Chase, both of which have expressed a positive outlook on TSMC’s future, maintaining an “overweight” rating on its stock.

Underpinning these developments is the U.S. government’s increasing interest in localizing semiconductor manufacturingTSMC is reportedly prepared to increase its factory capacity in America, potentially collaborating with Intel and perhaps even sharing intellectual property, to alleviate rising concerns from the governmentThis move would not only cater to local demand but would also be a strategic response to political pressures regarding supply chain and manufacturing autonomy.

In accordance with this strategy, JPMorgan has put forth a comprehensive analysis considering the scenarios of TSMC's expansion in the United StatesTheir reports suggest that TSMC’s growth within the U.S. remains a fundamental expectationThe company has set plans to increase its factory count in Arizona to six within the coming years, including three facilities that have already been announced.

However, it’s critical to remember that an increase in the number of factories is just part of the equationThe ambitious plans include a 20% enhancement in advanced process capacity, which might incorporate prospective fabs such as Fab 5 and Fab 4 that would feature advanced packaging technologies like Chip on Wafer on Substrate (CoWoS) and System on Integrated Chips (SoIC). These efforts are bolstered by a memorandum of understanding signed with Amkor Technology, suggesting an aggressive push by TSMC toward advanced manufacturing techniques.

The geopolitical landscape also adds layers of complexity to TSMC’s operations

Advertisements

The United States has floated the possibility of imposing tariffs ranging from 25% to 100% on semiconductor exports, a move that would significantly affect operational costsAnalysts from JPMorgan predict that TSMC may pass these costs onto their customers, which could lead to a general escalation in pricing, affecting businesses that rely on semiconductor technology, including American giants like Intel and MicronThe interdependencies in the supply chain highlight a potential double-edged sword where both manufacturers and clients bear the brunt of increased costs.

Furthermore, there are concerns that the imposition of tariffs may lead to a mutually detrimental scenario, affecting not just TSMC but also its American counterpartsFor instance, Intel sources around 30% of its wafers from TSMC, with additional production via its factories in Israel and Ireland using cutting-edge technologiesThis situation amplify the financial stakes across the board, indicating that the ramifications of tariff policies extend beyond TSMC itself.

Regarding the prospective establishment of research and development (R&D) facilities in the U.S., JPMorgan suspects that TSMC might adopt a model similar to its Japanese operations, establishing only a limited R&D presenceThis cautious approach stems from TSMC's recognition that scaling up operations overseas, especially in less integrated facilities, poses challenges in harmonizing development and manufacturing processes essential for advanced semiconductor technologies.

Speculation earlier this year hinted at the possibility of TSMC forming a joint venture with Intel to operate its factoriesNevertheless, reports citing White House officials suggested that this is not the preferred strategyTSMC has been open about the intricacies involved in such collaborations, emphasizing that differences in operational structures, cost regimes, and organizational cultures make the direct acquisition or management of external facilities an impractical objective

Advertisements

Hence, JPMorgan's commentary reflects a consensus that a massive restructuring within TSMC's operational framework remains improbable without pronounced governmental incentives.

Additional dialogues surrounding TSMC's potential sharing of process technology brought forth interesting points of contentionAnalysts dismissed proposals that TSMC could send engineers to Intel to implement its advanced methodologies, underscoring the company's assessment not only to protect intellectual property rigorously but also to maintain competitive leverage in a heavily contested market.

As these discussions evolve, Morgan Stanley also released insights into investor inquiries about TSMC's objectives concerning its U.S. factoriesTheir findings indicated a belief in the feasibility of TSMC’s continued expansion in the regionThe prevailing thought is that TSMC would offset any tariff-related expenses to its customers, rationalizing it as a mechanism for American clients to request increased domestic production to mitigate tariff risks.

Furthermore, the ongoing technology transfer initiatives underscore TSMC's long-term commitment to maintaining a technological edge with a goal to achieve production at the A16 node by 2030. This raises further inquiries about whether TSMC will consider establishing R&D centers in the U.S. or build CoWoS capacity on American soilUltimately, the decision-making process appears to be dictated by customer demand and shareholder value rather than merely a desire to support American semiconductor firms like Intel.

According to reports from various media outlets, there is a pressing concern that the newly formed U.S. administration might approach foreign enterprises operating semiconductor manufacturing units with skepticismTSMC’s board of directors conducted a pivotal meeting in the U.S. recently, yet it chose not to comment on tariff implications or geopolitical issues, indicating a deliberate measured response.

The backdrop against which TSMC navigates these complexities reflects a chess game of opportunities and challenges

Advertisements

Advertisements

Advertisements